微信公众号

官网二维码

中国癌症防治杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5): 547-551.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5671.2022.05.12

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

圈套器冷切除术与圈套器热切除术治疗直径4~9 mm无蒂结直肠息肉的疗效比较

  

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院西院区消化科
  • 出版日期:2022-10-25 发布日期:2022-11-09
  • 通讯作者: 尚占民 E-mail:shangmed@163.com

Comparison of efficacy between cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps

  • Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-11-09

摘要: 目的 比较圈套器冷切除术(cold snare polypectomy,CSP)与圈套器热切除术 (hot snare polypectomy,HSP)在治疗直径4~9 mm无蒂结直肠息肉中的疗效。方法 选取2021年6月至2021年11月在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院西院区消化科行内镜下息肉切除的187例患者,共284例息肉,其中145例息肉采用CSP治疗,139例息肉采用HSP治疗。本研究主要评价指标为息肉的完整切除率,次要评价指标为标本回收率、操作时间、治疗费用及住院时间,并发症包括术中出血率、迟发出血率及穿孔率。结果 CSP组的完整切除率为90.34%,HSP组为92.09%,两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.336)。在术中出血方面,CSP组发生7例,HSP组发生5例,两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.606)。CSP组发生迟发出血1例,HSP组无迟发出血。两组均未发生穿孔。所有息肉切除所获标本均成功收回。CSP组平均操作时间短于HSP组 (70.6 s vs 75.2 s,P<0.001)。CSP组治疗平均费用低于HSP组(1 371.00元 vs 2 434.90元,P<0.001) 。CSP组平均住院时间短于HSP组(2.9 d vs 3.6 d,P<0.001)。结论 CSP与HSP同样为切除直径4~9 mm无蒂结直肠息肉安全、有效的治疗方式,但CSP操作更省时,患者花费更少、住院时间更短。

关键词:  , 结直肠癌;圈套器冷切除术;圈套器热切除术;结直肠息肉

Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy between the cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps. Methods A total of 187 patients who underwent polypectomy in  the Department of Gastroenterology of Beijing Chao-yang Hospital from June 2021 to November 2021 were selected as research subjects, included 284 polyps, among which 145 were treated with CSP and 139 were treated with HSP. The primary study endpoint was the complete resection rate, and the secondary study endpoints included polyp retrieval rate, polypectomy time, the cost of polypectomy and length of hospital stays. The complications included immediate bleeding, delayed bleeding and perforation. Results  The complete resection rate in CSP group and HSP group were 90.34% and 92.09%(P=0.336), respectively. The immediate bleeding occurred in 7 cases in the CSP group and 5 cases in the HSP group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.606). There was 1 case of late bleeding in the CSP group and none in the HSP group. Perforation did not occur in either group. All specimens obtained after polypectomy were successfully recovered. The procedure time of the CSP group was shorter than that of the HSP group (70.6 s vs 75.2 s, P<0.001). The average cost in the CSP group was lower than that in the HSP group (¥1 371.00 vs ¥2 434.90, P<0.001). The average length of hospital stays in the CSP group was shorter than that in the HSP group (2.9 d vs 3.6 d, P<0.001). Conclusions Both CSP and HSP are safe and effective treatment methods for the 4-9 mm colorectal polyps. However, CSP is more time-saving with less cost and shorter hospital stays.

Key words: Colorectal Cancer, Cold snare polypectomy, Hot snare polypectomy, Colorectal polyps

中图分类号: 

  • R735.3+5