微信公众号

官网二维码

中国癌症防治杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1): 75-80.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5671.2023.01.12

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于ClinicalTrials.gov数据库分析骨肉瘤临床试验注册现状

  

  1. 广西医科大学第二附属医院急诊科;广西医科大学第一附属医院临床医学实验中心
  • 出版日期:2023-02-25 发布日期:2023-03-01
  • 通讯作者: 凌志安 E?mail:zhianling@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    广西自然科学基金项目(2019JJA140546);广西高校中青年教师科研基础能力提升项目(2019KY0117)

Analysis of the registration status of osteosarcoma clinical trial based on ClinicalTrials.gov database

  • Online:2023-02-25 Published:2023-03-01

摘要: 目的 分析全球骨肉瘤临床试验注册情况,了解该领域研究现状和发展态势,为骨肉瘤研究和临床诊治提供新的信息。方法 通过采集2001—2021年期间在美国 ClinicalTrials.gov注册平台注册的骨肉瘤临床试验数据,从区域分布、年度趋势、试验进展、研究类型、临床分期、参与机构数量等进行多方面的统计分析。结果 2001—2021年间,全球骨肉瘤临床试验共注册514项,主要集中在北美洲和欧洲;其中干预性临床试验有416项(80.9%),药物相关治疗占87.0%(362/416),抗肿瘤药物研究有127种;显示已完成干预性临床试验仅147项(35.3%),其中已发表论文71项(48.3%),公布试验结果33项(46.5%)。与2001—2011年相比,2012—2021年间在亚洲地区注册的骨肉瘤干预性临床试验比例从6.1%(10/163)增加到15.0%(38/253),招募前注册从1.2%(2/163)增加到43.9%(111/253),但Ⅱ期临床试验数量在这2个时间段依旧占比最大,分别为46.0%(75/163)和37.9%(96/253)。结论 全球大多数骨肉瘤研究为干预性临床试验,主要集中在药物相关治疗,抗肿瘤药物仍然是骨肉瘤药物干预研究的首选。亚洲地区注册的干预性临床试验较之前明显增加,但研究质量和数量与北美洲、欧洲地区差异仍较大。

关键词: 骨肉瘤;ClinicalTrials.gov;临床试验 

Abstract: Objective To analyze the global registration of osteosarcoma clinical trials, to understand the research status and trend of the field, and to provide the latest information for osteosarcoma research and clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods The data of osteosarcoma clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov from 2001 to 2021 were collected and statistically analyzed in terms of regional distribution, annual trend, trial progress, research type, clinical stage, and number of participating institutions. Results From 2001 to 2021, a total of 514 global osteosarcoma clinical trials were registered, mainly in North America and Europe. Among them, 416 (80.9%) were interventional clinical trials, 87.0% (362/416) were drug⁃related treatments, and 127 were anti⁃tumor drug studies. The results showed that only 147 (35.3%) interventional clinical trials had been completed, including 71 (48.3%) published papers and 33 (46.5%) published trial results. Compared with 2001-2011, the proportion of interventional clinical trials for osteosarcoma registered in Asia increased from 6.1% (10/163) to 15.0% (38/253) between 2012 and 2021, and the proportion of pre⁃recruitment registrations increased from 1.2% (2/163) to 43.9% (111/253), However, the number of phase Ⅱ clinical trials still accounted for the largest proportion in these two periods, which were 46.0% (75/163) and 37.9% (96/253), respectively. Conclusions The majority of global osteosarcoma studies are interventional clinical trials, mainly focusing on drug⁃related treatments, and antitumor drugs are still the first choice for the osteosarcoma drug intervention research. The number of osteosarcoma interventional clinical trials registered in Asia has increased significantly, but the quality and quantity of these researches are still quite different from those in North America and Europe.

Key words: Osteosarcoma, ClinicalTrials.gov, Clinical trials

中图分类号: 

  • R738