Wechat

Website

Chinese Journal of Oncology Prevention and Treatment ›› 2018, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3): 198-204.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5671.2018.03.07

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prediction and identification of HLA-A2-restricted CTL epitopes from ovarian cancer-associated antigen TM4SF1

  

  • Online:2018-06-25 Published:2018-07-02

Abstract:

 Objective To predict and identify HLA-A2-restricted CTL epitopes from ovarian cancer-associated antigen TM4SF1. Methods Four prediction programs(BIMAS,SYFPEITHI,IEDB,PROPRED I)were used to predict HLA-A2-restricted CTL epitopes of TM4SF1. Immunoreactivity of these predicted epitopes was measured using ELISOPT directly and in culture. Results Ten candidate CTL epitopes (P1-P10) were screened,and four (P1,P2,P8,P10) were analyzed further for immunoreactivity. SFC was significantly higher in culture ELISPOT than direct ELISPOT for the positive control peptide (322±8 vs 169±22,P<0.05),epitope P1 (114±10 vs 39±7,P<0.05),and epitope P10 (156±31 vs 52±8,P<0.05). Similarly,average spot size was significantly greater in culture ELISPOT than direct ELISPOT for the positive control peptide (21.91±2.45 vs 13.80±1.76,P<0.05),P1 (12.90±0.88 vs 8.31±1.40,P<0.05),and P10 (17.50±3.85 vs 11.96±0.61,P<0.05). These results show that culture ELISPOT is more sensitive than direct ELISPOT,and that the SFC T value is higher for epitope P10 than P1. Conclusions Combining four prediction programs is an effective strategy to identify better candidate epitopes and avoid limitations of a single prediction program. Culture ELISPOT is more sensitive than the direct assay for verifying the immunoreactivity of predicted epitopes. The immunoreactivity of P10 is strongest.

Key words: Ovarian neoplasms, TM4SF1, HLA-A2 restricted CTL epitope, Immunoreactivity